Good morning! It’s Friday, and this week, I’m just going to do a straight four-way runoff. Nothing fancy, no weird scenarios, just pick your favorite. I think I’m going to come up with a theme of some sort for next week. If we’ve done one in the past you enjoyed, or if you have a new suggestion, let me know in the comments. I’m open to ideas.
[Ed note: Mark loaded all the in-story photos for today’s Showdown before the site decided it wasn’t going to take photos anymore, so that’s an old Friday Free-For-All up there in the top spot. I’m doing my best here …– Pete]
For now, though, let’s crown yesterday’s winner. It’s probably no surprise that the Honda Accord walked away with this one. The little Tercel probably isn’t a bad choice, but here it was simply outclassed. Sometimes the cheapest option isn’t the best.
It’s the Honda every day and twice on Sundays for me. I am a big fan of second- and third-generation Accords, having owned one and driven or ridden in many others. Like a lot of you, I’d prefer a manual, but this is one rare instance when I’m not bothered by the presence of a carburetor.
[Pete here again. The Honda Accord bested the Toyota Tercel, 76.4% to 23.26%]
All right, let’s just keep this nice and simple today. Pros and cons of each car, as I see them, to refresh your memory. Here we go.
1987 Ford Tempo AWD – $2,750
The case for it: It’s incredibly clean for its age. It’s 4WD, which is kind of a novelty for a Tempo, and makes it a better-than-average winter car. It’s an old enough model to escape the indignity of motorized seat belts. And unlike some rare ’80s survivors, it’s not extortionately priced.
The case against it: It’s a Ford Tempo, with everything that entails. It’s slow, the transmission is fragile, and the interior fit and finish is, let’s say, casual.
1989 Chrysler TC by Maserati – $2,500
The case for it: it’s a one-of-500 coachbuilt special, equipped with a very cool turbocharged twin-cam engine and a five-speed stick. The interior is gorgeous. And it’s a really reasonable price for an up-and-coming classic.
The case against it: it doesn’t run. The seller says it’s just a bad fuel pump, but it has been sitting since 2020, so it will almost certainly need more than that. It also has kind of a cheesy reputation, so you may be the butt of some jokes, if you care.
2011 Ford Transit Connect XLT – $2,900
The case for it: it’s a little box on wheels, and if you can’t think of a use for that, you probably lead a very dull life. It’s also a commercial vehicle, which means it’s built for longevity and toughness.
The case against it: it’s beat-up and scarred inside, and still wears the livery of a florist from Roswell, New Mexico outside. Chances are you wouldn’t want to keep that. Or maybe you would; if so, you do you. I won’t judge.
1987 Honda Accord DX – $3,500
The case for it: It’s a 1980s Honda, which might very well someday come to be known as the peak of all automobiledom. It’s in really good condition, especially for the mileage. And while it’s a little more money than some of the other options, it’s still really reasonable.
The case against it: it has an automatic transmission in a car that really deserves a manual. And the ad is woefully short of information, so it’s hard to judge its actual condition without going to look at it.
So there you have it, the week’s winners. Now it’s time for you to choose a favorite. And like I said at the top, if there’s a theme you want to see for next week, let me know, and I’ll see what I can do. Thanks for reading!
The post Two Beige Sedans, A Broken Convertible, And A Flower Van: What’s Your Favorite? appeared first on The Autopian.
